Main

June 26, 2007

Looking for a High Performance Team? February 13, 2006

Looking for a High Performance Team?

Coach Daley

 

As a business coach I watch business organizations as a student.  I'm always looking for the unique characteristics of successful (or unsuccessful) organizations and as you know it usually boils down to leadership.  Nothing new… right?  Look at sports; you can have great players and a manager that struggle to win.  What about the gold medal winning US Hockey team with an outstanding coach but no superstars? One manager can be the biggest hindrance to success and that would be the "tribal manager".  (The Strategic Partnering Handbook) 

 

Remember, "Leaders" create a vision and are enthusiastically followed:

 

"Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it." Dwight D. Eisenhower

 

"Leaders create an environment where teams thrive and produce beyond even their expectations, managers without leadership skills stress teams out and so production is work, people do only do the minimum not to get fired and struggle to do that much." Coach Daley

 

"The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality.  The last is to say thank you.   In between, the leader is a servant." Max De Pree

 

"Managers" struggle with a sincere "thank you", because it could go to their subordinates head, make them think they are more important than they are to the manager, after all the subordinate is just completing tasks...their job... right?  "Managers" dictate, intimidate and do things themselves. Why would they do things themselves?  First to show the team they are not needed just tolerated.  And secondly to show their superiors they can do the job themselves, matter a fact, they believe the team is taking the credit they should have.  If they feel the superior is questioning who is the hero the manager will show them by doing the task themselves or moving some else to do it.  It's just a task. This makes perfect sense if you consider they see their job as their career development,  as the organization and implementation of tasks not leadership and development of people.  They are the "alpha male" or female, they are always jockeying for political position and competing with their own team to show they are the superior and the manager.  The scary thing with these managers is that they don't see this behavior. They tend to be very insecure and hence "Alpha males" are dangerous to any up and comers they see as a threat, how many future leaders can your organization afford to lose?  My dad used to say watch what people do, not what they say.  He must have had these managers in mind.  Bottom line, first on their priority list is their status, second is positioning for their career growth, and last is tasks. People are necessary evils they have to put up with.  These managers look at their subordinates from their (the manager) perspective. These managers love the line "Salary Continuation Plan!"  "You should be glad to have your job." "Stay below the radar screen and complete your tasks as I laid them out!"  "I can replace you tomorrow!"

 

If companies are successful due to people and they spend big bucks and time to hire the right people for the right jobs, create an environment for success (for each particular person) and reward them for successful performance (in a manner they see as a reward) than the above managers are not indicative of a successful company are they? 

 

Consider a couple of facts:

·       Most people leave do to their managers!

·        Bad employees don't quit, where would they go?

·        Leadership starts at the top and the corporate culture helps sustain Leadership (the opposite is also true)

 

Do you have a leadership problem?
Is it costing you a high performance team?

 

In our workshops we teach to constantly observe, not to judge to quickly.  Things are never black and white.  Having said that ask yourselves the following questions and see if you have a trend that is costing your organization maximum performance and limiting your bottom line.

 

  1. Usually about 20% of your team will be self starters that should excel with minimal leadership so these are the people to watch.  If they are stressed then you might have a leadership problem.
  2. If you call a meeting of one of your leaders teams and they can not or will not speak openly you may have a leadership problem?
    1. Manager could be jockeying for political position and does not want that impacted by his or her necessary evils!
  3. Do you as a manager enjoy reaching visions through people or do you wish you could just do it yourself?
    1. You could be a driver?
    2. You could be an entrepreneur that just needs to grow to leadership or find a leader.
  4. Ask your manager what motivates their team, what are their individual goals? If you have a leadership problem these managers will tell you what "should" motivate their team, not what does! Ask for specifics of each teammate. 
  5. Has the manager found a way to align the teammate’s goals with the organizational goals?  
  6. How are the teammates coming with their goal attainment? 
  7. Would a 360 survey be helpful? Click here
  8. Do you want to be a leader but feel you are just a manager?  Would you like to start on the journey to be a leader?  It takes knowledge, experience and then skill: Click here
    1. Are your managers coachable? Or do they tell you that you just don't understand?
    2. Can they be developed into leaders of teams? 

 

Do you possible have a leadership problem?  Is it costing you at the bottom line?  Would you like to learn more?  www.daleygroup.org


Hosting by Yahoo!

The Human Element! One plus One equals three! June 25, 2007

The Human Element!  One plus One equals three!
Coach John Daley

 

How can a Football team get a new coaching staff for the same players and drastically improve their record?  How can a large company get a new CEO for the same people and drastically improve their performance?  Why will a “group of superstars” get beat by a team of average players? (US Hockey Team, 1980 Olympics)  It’s the human affect, one plus one equals three.

 

When a business hires a new employee they evaluate the talent of that employee as they performed in past environments but do they evaluate the talent as they will perform with in the new organization.  There are two elements in placing a human resource into a team.  The team and the new hire together become a new team.  Together the new hire and the team have to be better than either would have been separately.  If we have a superstar but put them into a “toxic environment” they will under perform.  If you hire a detractor and make them a member of a successful team that team will under perform.  If the leadership allows the detractor to detract long enough the best and strongest teammates will leave and others will become toxic with the detractor. One plus one will equal 0! 

 

When we work with a leader we ask them to close their eyes and think about their most challenging employee.  Some of the expressions we see are amazing.  We ask them if they think about any of their problem employees when they go home.  What does that do to a manager’s performance at work and at home? We then ask them to think of their best employee.  The smiles replace the tension and stress.  If the leaders have that reaction wouldn’t you expect to get the same reaction from employees when asked about the leadership or fellow employees?  Which situation is most likely to evoke The Human Element of One plus One equals Three and which probably equals .5 or less? 

 

It is difficult to forecast the future performance of a team by their past record if you change one player or coach on the team.  Statisticians will tell you the probabilities of future performance by their record only to have a new leader or team mate come in a break all records.  They are a positive catalyst.  Should the world be round, should airplanes fly or should we have walked on the moon?  Not according to what we knew 100 years ago!  Should we be walking around talking on cell phones or listening to IPods?  Not according to what was believed to be fact 50 years ago.  Could these have happened because of the Human Element of One plus one equals three?

 

The definition of leadership is getting things done through other people.  Does the leadership place or remove obstacles to the success of the team.  When a business finds a superstar will they want to be on their team? Will they stay?  Does the leadership have a positive attitude and plan for the whole team to win?  Does the team understand and buy into the leaders plan completely.  Is the team a well run machine that functions better than any one member could by themselves. Is the team void of detractors?   If so then The Human Element applies, One plus One equals Three.  When you have a well run positive team your can expect your ROI to go off the scale and that is when visions and dreams become reality in spite of what history tell us should be possible.

 

 


Hosting by Yahoo!